<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The KRA Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kansasra.org/blog/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog</link>
	<description>Kansas Conservative Politics and Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:33:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Official Democrat blog says don&#8217;t worry, Dr. Johnston won&#8217;t back party by Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/2397/comment-page-1#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=2397#comment-611</guid>
		<description>Look...a real, face to face conversation with someone you&#039;ve known for a long time and has never lied to you in the past is much, much closer to a &quot;fact&quot; than reading a politician&#039;s unfounded claim that he or she made without even knowing what another person has said or believes.

I think what you&#039;re going by is what Cornyn said.  I submit that Cornyn was going to say what he said no matter which Democrat came out of that Primary.  My point is, he doesn&#039;t even know what Lisa believes.  He&#039;s never met her, never talked to her and probably didn&#039;t think that, since she&#039;s not a &quot;politician&quot;, she&#039;d even make it out of the Primary, so you shouldn&#039;t be listening to him.  What I&#039;m saying about her, I know for an absolute fact, because I&#039;ve known her for 21 years and we&#039;ve had more conversations than I can count on these topics.

So to you, yeah...I&#039;ll give you that it&#039;s a &quot;story&quot;, because it&#039;s second hand.  My compliments on not just believing someone based on what they&#039;ve said about another person.  But the question is, who are you going to believe?  I think it&#039;s been proven over and over again that you can&#039;t trust a &quot;career politician&quot;, no matter which party they&#039;re in.

Now...let me share with you exactly what she&#039;s said in black and white:

&quot;It is important for every woman or family to be able to make a decision based on individual circumstances in consultation with a doctor. Most people agree that in cases of extreme trauma, abuse, or life threatening health considerations the option for medical intervention is important. Additionally, individuals can be personally pro-life but support choice because they do not feel it is their place to make this decision for another person.&quot;

To me...that sounds like individual Liberty.  I doubt you&#039;d get a statement like that from someone like Pelosi or Reid.  Basically what she&#039;s said is, the government should keep their tentacles out of it, whichever side they&#039;re on personally.  The fact is, the vast majority of women who have had an abortion, regret having made that decision, as well they should.  There are consequences for those actions.  But it&#039;s an individual decision that the government should have no say in, one way or the other.  That&#039;s between the woman and God (who I&#039;m sure isn&#039;t happy about it).

And below is another statement that speaks to what I said in my first comment:

&quot;We need more transparency in government to allow everyday citizens to become informed about potential legislation so that they can evaluate potential changes and provide feedback. I believe it is important to make plain language, factual summaries of all bills available for citizens to read and consider. True representation can only occur if citizens have access to information and can share their opinions with elected officials.&quot;

What makes her different from any of the other people running in that race is that she actually means what she says.  I can honestly say that because that&#039;s what she has told me personally on many occasions.

And lastly...on my views.  I think I probably am leaning more toward the Libertarian views these days.  Their slogan is &quot;Maximum Freedom, Minimum Government&quot;.  I think they probably fall a little closer to anarchy than I&#039;d like to go, but I agree with the slogan.  And I wish the Republican Party would slide closer to that view than they are.  What people don&#039;t understand is that there are &quot;Progressives&quot; controlling the Republican Party just like they&#039;re controlling the Democrat Party.  Remember Megan McCain, John McCain&#039;s daughter?  She has referred to herself as a &quot;Progressive Republican&quot;.  And, that, I believe because they&#039;re words right from her own mouth.

What I&#039;ve told Lisa she needs to call herself is an &quot;early 20th Century Liberal&quot;.  I&#039;m borrowing from what Hillary Clinton said about herself...saying she&#039;s an &quot;early 20th Century Progressive&quot;.  In the early 20th Century, a Liberal was a Libertarian.  Then, the Progressives hijacked the label, because people finally wised up to what they were trying to do and started kicking them out.  I won&#039;t go into the entire history, because I&#039;m sure you (like I do) watch Beck and know the history.

So...to summarize, what I would like you, and everyone else, to do, is do your own research before you start jumping to conclusions.  Don&#039;t believe the statements of any career politician without getting the facts for yourself.  It&#039;s been proven over and over again that those people, no matter which party they&#039;re in, are in it only for themselves and will do or say anything that they believe will keep them in power.  If you&#039;re concerned about Lisa&#039;s views on something, call or email her.  The contact information is on her website (lisaforkansas.com).  I think you, along with most people, will be surprised when you learn more and get the &quot;facts&quot; straight from the &quot;horse&#039;s mouth&quot; (so to speak).

Lisa has said, &quot;I may look sweet, but I&#039;m a fighter.&quot;  That statement isn&#039;t only directed toward a political opponent.  It&#039;s also directed toward the Pelosi&#039;s and Reid&#039;s in the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look&#8230;a real, face to face conversation with someone you&#8217;ve known for a long time and has never lied to you in the past is much, much closer to a &#8220;fact&#8221; than reading a politician&#8217;s unfounded claim that he or she made without even knowing what another person has said or believes.</p>
<p>I think what you&#8217;re going by is what Cornyn said.  I submit that Cornyn was going to say what he said no matter which Democrat came out of that Primary.  My point is, he doesn&#8217;t even know what Lisa believes.  He&#8217;s never met her, never talked to her and probably didn&#8217;t think that, since she&#8217;s not a &#8220;politician&#8221;, she&#8217;d even make it out of the Primary, so you shouldn&#8217;t be listening to him.  What I&#8217;m saying about her, I know for an absolute fact, because I&#8217;ve known her for 21 years and we&#8217;ve had more conversations than I can count on these topics.</p>
<p>So to you, yeah&#8230;I&#8217;ll give you that it&#8217;s a &#8220;story&#8221;, because it&#8217;s second hand.  My compliments on not just believing someone based on what they&#8217;ve said about another person.  But the question is, who are you going to believe?  I think it&#8217;s been proven over and over again that you can&#8217;t trust a &#8220;career politician&#8221;, no matter which party they&#8217;re in.</p>
<p>Now&#8230;let me share with you exactly what she&#8217;s said in black and white:</p>
<p>&#8220;It is important for every woman or family to be able to make a decision based on individual circumstances in consultation with a doctor. Most people agree that in cases of extreme trauma, abuse, or life threatening health considerations the option for medical intervention is important. Additionally, individuals can be personally pro-life but support choice because they do not feel it is their place to make this decision for another person.&#8221;</p>
<p>To me&#8230;that sounds like individual Liberty.  I doubt you&#8217;d get a statement like that from someone like Pelosi or Reid.  Basically what she&#8217;s said is, the government should keep their tentacles out of it, whichever side they&#8217;re on personally.  The fact is, the vast majority of women who have had an abortion, regret having made that decision, as well they should.  There are consequences for those actions.  But it&#8217;s an individual decision that the government should have no say in, one way or the other.  That&#8217;s between the woman and God (who I&#8217;m sure isn&#8217;t happy about it).</p>
<p>And below is another statement that speaks to what I said in my first comment:</p>
<p>&#8220;We need more transparency in government to allow everyday citizens to become informed about potential legislation so that they can evaluate potential changes and provide feedback. I believe it is important to make plain language, factual summaries of all bills available for citizens to read and consider. True representation can only occur if citizens have access to information and can share their opinions with elected officials.&#8221;</p>
<p>What makes her different from any of the other people running in that race is that she actually means what she says.  I can honestly say that because that&#8217;s what she has told me personally on many occasions.</p>
<p>And lastly&#8230;on my views.  I think I probably am leaning more toward the Libertarian views these days.  Their slogan is &#8220;Maximum Freedom, Minimum Government&#8221;.  I think they probably fall a little closer to anarchy than I&#8217;d like to go, but I agree with the slogan.  And I wish the Republican Party would slide closer to that view than they are.  What people don&#8217;t understand is that there are &#8220;Progressives&#8221; controlling the Republican Party just like they&#8217;re controlling the Democrat Party.  Remember Megan McCain, John McCain&#8217;s daughter?  She has referred to herself as a &#8220;Progressive Republican&#8221;.  And, that, I believe because they&#8217;re words right from her own mouth.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve told Lisa she needs to call herself is an &#8220;early 20th Century Liberal&#8221;.  I&#8217;m borrowing from what Hillary Clinton said about herself&#8230;saying she&#8217;s an &#8220;early 20th Century Progressive&#8221;.  In the early 20th Century, a Liberal was a Libertarian.  Then, the Progressives hijacked the label, because people finally wised up to what they were trying to do and started kicking them out.  I won&#8217;t go into the entire history, because I&#8217;m sure you (like I do) watch Beck and know the history.</p>
<p>So&#8230;to summarize, what I would like you, and everyone else, to do, is do your own research before you start jumping to conclusions.  Don&#8217;t believe the statements of any career politician without getting the facts for yourself.  It&#8217;s been proven over and over again that those people, no matter which party they&#8217;re in, are in it only for themselves and will do or say anything that they believe will keep them in power.  If you&#8217;re concerned about Lisa&#8217;s views on something, call or email her.  The contact information is on her website (lisaforkansas.com).  I think you, along with most people, will be surprised when you learn more and get the &#8220;facts&#8221; straight from the &#8220;horse&#8217;s mouth&#8221; (so to speak).</p>
<p>Lisa has said, &#8220;I may look sweet, but I&#8217;m a fighter.&#8221;  That statement isn&#8217;t only directed toward a political opponent.  It&#8217;s also directed toward the Pelosi&#8217;s and Reid&#8217;s in the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Official Democrat blog says don&#8217;t worry, Dr. Johnston won&#8217;t back party by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/2397/comment-page-1#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 02:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=2397#comment-610</guid>
		<description>What you&#039;ve described is libertarian, not conservative.And your views on abortion are almost word for word how pro-abortion Republicans discuss it. And your conversations may be &quot;facts&quot; to you, but they&#039;re nothing more than a story to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you&#8217;ve described is libertarian, not conservative.And your views on abortion are almost word for word how pro-abortion Republicans discuss it. And your conversations may be &#8220;facts&#8221; to you, but they&#8217;re nothing more than a story to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Official Democrat blog says don&#8217;t worry, Dr. Johnston won&#8217;t back party by Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/2397/comment-page-1#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 01:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=2397#comment-609</guid>
		<description>There you go again with your speculations.  My email address is one that I&#039;ve had since 1996 when I was in a Doctoral program at KU.  Guess what...decided to go a different route so I&#039;m NOT a Doctor.  So to anyone who might read this...I&#039;M NOT A DOCTOR.  Besides...you&#039;re the only one who can see my email address and I really don&#039;t care if I&#039;m impressing you or not.

And what I stated is NOT an &quot;opinion&quot;.  It&#039;s an actual fact, based on lots and lots of conversations.  Have you had that conversation with her?  Ummm...no, you haven&#039;t.  So don&#039;t tell me you know how or what a person thinks when you haven&#039;t even talked with him or her.  Only a fool believes everything he hears or reads third, fourth or seventieth person.  Get out of your basement, put down the Red Bull, get a job and do something productive with your life.

About your &quot;pro-aborts&quot; comment.  Where exactly did you come up with that one?  Public record?  Where?  If what you&#039;re saying is a &quot;fact&quot;, then you&#039;ll have evidence to back it up, right?  So why don&#039;t you show us?  What?  No link?  Nothing in her actual words?  Nothing to show us?  Hmmm...something smells a little fishy here.  Sounds a little like Emanuel Cleaver&#039;s accusations about the Tea Partiers.  A lot of smoke, but no fire.

I, on the other hand, know exactly what she thinks about that issue.  Have you had a personal conversation with her on that?  I have.  I won&#039;t speak for her (she can do that just fine for herself), but as for me, both the Pro-Lifers and Pro-Abortion people have it wrong.  It should be a personal issue, but the government should stay out of it.  If you&#039;re a true Christian (and I&#039;m just assuming you consider yourself a Christian), then you know that you&#039;re really in no position to judge.  I hate to quote &quot;The Chosen One&quot;, but it&#039;s really above your pay grade.  If a woman has an abortion, it&#039;s wrong and she&#039;ll have to face the music later.  But what you have to ask yourself is, &quot;What would Jesus do?&quot;  I think you know the answer to that.  It&#039;s a little thing called Grace and forgiveness.

Now...Mr. Holier Than Thou...what would he have to say about someone like you?  Take any comment He made about the Pharisees and insert it here.

A real Conservative believes the Government should stay out of our personal and professional lives.  I believe that&#039;s called Liberty.  You aren&#039;t a Conservative.  You&#039;re a Nazi.  You&#039;re what the Republican Party has become and what the Tea Party is fighting against.  You&#039;re what we affectionately refer to as a RINO and what we&#039;re trying to purge from our ranks.

And finally...I can give you some pointers on how to set up Wordpress, if you&#039;d like.  It&#039;s obvious you don&#039;t know how, because you&#039;re still posting as &quot;admin&quot;...the default.  It&#039;s sad...just sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There you go again with your speculations.  My email address is one that I&#8217;ve had since 1996 when I was in a Doctoral program at KU.  Guess what&#8230;decided to go a different route so I&#8217;m NOT a Doctor.  So to anyone who might read this&#8230;I&#8217;M NOT A DOCTOR.  Besides&#8230;you&#8217;re the only one who can see my email address and I really don&#8217;t care if I&#8217;m impressing you or not.</p>
<p>And what I stated is NOT an &#8220;opinion&#8221;.  It&#8217;s an actual fact, based on lots and lots of conversations.  Have you had that conversation with her?  Ummm&#8230;no, you haven&#8217;t.  So don&#8217;t tell me you know how or what a person thinks when you haven&#8217;t even talked with him or her.  Only a fool believes everything he hears or reads third, fourth or seventieth person.  Get out of your basement, put down the Red Bull, get a job and do something productive with your life.</p>
<p>About your &#8220;pro-aborts&#8221; comment.  Where exactly did you come up with that one?  Public record?  Where?  If what you&#8217;re saying is a &#8220;fact&#8221;, then you&#8217;ll have evidence to back it up, right?  So why don&#8217;t you show us?  What?  No link?  Nothing in her actual words?  Nothing to show us?  Hmmm&#8230;something smells a little fishy here.  Sounds a little like Emanuel Cleaver&#8217;s accusations about the Tea Partiers.  A lot of smoke, but no fire.</p>
<p>I, on the other hand, know exactly what she thinks about that issue.  Have you had a personal conversation with her on that?  I have.  I won&#8217;t speak for her (she can do that just fine for herself), but as for me, both the Pro-Lifers and Pro-Abortion people have it wrong.  It should be a personal issue, but the government should stay out of it.  If you&#8217;re a true Christian (and I&#8217;m just assuming you consider yourself a Christian), then you know that you&#8217;re really in no position to judge.  I hate to quote &#8220;The Chosen One&#8221;, but it&#8217;s really above your pay grade.  If a woman has an abortion, it&#8217;s wrong and she&#8217;ll have to face the music later.  But what you have to ask yourself is, &#8220;What would Jesus do?&#8221;  I think you know the answer to that.  It&#8217;s a little thing called Grace and forgiveness.</p>
<p>Now&#8230;Mr. Holier Than Thou&#8230;what would he have to say about someone like you?  Take any comment He made about the Pharisees and insert it here.</p>
<p>A real Conservative believes the Government should stay out of our personal and professional lives.  I believe that&#8217;s called Liberty.  You aren&#8217;t a Conservative.  You&#8217;re a Nazi.  You&#8217;re what the Republican Party has become and what the Tea Party is fighting against.  You&#8217;re what we affectionately refer to as a RINO and what we&#8217;re trying to purge from our ranks.</p>
<p>And finally&#8230;I can give you some pointers on how to set up WordPress, if you&#8217;d like.  It&#8217;s obvious you don&#8217;t know how, because you&#8217;re still posting as &#8220;admin&#8221;&#8230;the default.  It&#8217;s sad&#8230;just sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Official Democrat blog says don&#8217;t worry, Dr. Johnston won&#8217;t back party by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/2397/comment-page-1#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 22:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=2397#comment-608</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re too funny Jason. You&#039;re opinions of your friend are not &quot;facts&quot;, they are your opinions. What I&#039;ve posted are facts, things that can be verified by the public record. Now if you don&#039;t like the conclusions I&#039;ve made based off of those facts, then tough.

And don&#039;t call yourself a conservative. Conservatives don&#039;t support pro-aborts like Johnston. Period.

And by the way, love the email address you use. I too have a &quot;Doctor&quot; in front of my name, which I also gained from KU. But I don&#039;t feel the need power trip people with it. That&#039;s the difference between Lisa and me. And it looks like based off of your email address, it&#039;s a difference between you and myself as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re too funny Jason. You&#8217;re opinions of your friend are not &#8220;facts&#8221;, they are your opinions. What I&#8217;ve posted are facts, things that can be verified by the public record. Now if you don&#8217;t like the conclusions I&#8217;ve made based off of those facts, then tough.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t call yourself a conservative. Conservatives don&#8217;t support pro-aborts like Johnston. Period.</p>
<p>And by the way, love the email address you use. I too have a &#8220;Doctor&#8221; in front of my name, which I also gained from KU. But I don&#8217;t feel the need power trip people with it. That&#8217;s the difference between Lisa and me. And it looks like based off of your email address, it&#8217;s a difference between you and myself as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Official Democrat blog says don&#8217;t worry, Dr. Johnston won&#8217;t back party by Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/2397/comment-page-1#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 21:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=2397#comment-607</guid>
		<description>First off, I&#039;m neither a Democrat nor a Republican.  I&#039;m a Conservative which is something different from either of those parties as far as I&#039;m concerned.  And I can tell you without a doubt that Lisa will absolutely NOT be a rubber stamp for anyone in ANY party.  How do I know that, you might ask.  I&#039;ve known her for 21 years and I talk to her every other day.

Let me just give you one example of why she decided to get into the race to begin with.  The fact that the Healthcare Bill (now Law) was 2000 pages of nothing but legalize that no one read (or could even understand for that matter).  She was appalled by that and thought it was completely ridiculous.  So don&#039;t try to tell me or anyone else that she&#039;s just going to be another &quot;Yes&quot; vote for ANY politician.  She&#039;s in it for the folks.

Now...my suggestion to you would be to not just get your facts straight, but to get your facts...period...before you start spouting off your &quot;opinion&quot; about someone.

What you&#039;ve stated here is totally based on your conjecture about politicians.  I&#039;m here to tell you that Lisa is NOT a politician.  Why is &quot;Doctor&quot; in front of her name?  It&#039;s to illustrate that point.  You call her &quot;elitist&quot;?  I contend that it is YOU are behaving like an elitist, putting yourself and your pre-formed opinion above another person.

I&#039;ve got news for you...you&#039;re not always right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I&#8217;m neither a Democrat nor a Republican.  I&#8217;m a Conservative which is something different from either of those parties as far as I&#8217;m concerned.  And I can tell you without a doubt that Lisa will absolutely NOT be a rubber stamp for anyone in ANY party.  How do I know that, you might ask.  I&#8217;ve known her for 21 years and I talk to her every other day.</p>
<p>Let me just give you one example of why she decided to get into the race to begin with.  The fact that the Healthcare Bill (now Law) was 2000 pages of nothing but legalize that no one read (or could even understand for that matter).  She was appalled by that and thought it was completely ridiculous.  So don&#8217;t try to tell me or anyone else that she&#8217;s just going to be another &#8220;Yes&#8221; vote for ANY politician.  She&#8217;s in it for the folks.</p>
<p>Now&#8230;my suggestion to you would be to not just get your facts straight, but to get your facts&#8230;period&#8230;before you start spouting off your &#8220;opinion&#8221; about someone.</p>
<p>What you&#8217;ve stated here is totally based on your conjecture about politicians.  I&#8217;m here to tell you that Lisa is NOT a politician.  Why is &#8220;Doctor&#8221; in front of her name?  It&#8217;s to illustrate that point.  You call her &#8220;elitist&#8221;?  I contend that it is YOU are behaving like an elitist, putting yourself and your pre-formed opinion above another person.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got news for you&#8230;you&#8217;re not always right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Goyle forced to remind voters he&#8217;s a Democrat by PRwichita</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/2368/comment-page-1#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>PRwichita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 15:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=2368#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Rajeev Goyle
Democrat Candidate for Congress

Mr. Goyle;

I have serious questions about your rather hypocritical campaign advertising, most notably the commercial at this link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kv7oCrClE84

How can you keep a straight face, when you attack the &quot;outsourcing of American Jobs&quot; and &quot;tax breaks&quot; for outsourcing jobs, when so many people, who are very close to you, make their living doing EXACTLY that?

Let us begin with Rajiv Shah, the director of USAID or the United States Agency for International Development. Mr. Shah did more than just give &quot;tax breaks&quot; for outsourcing jobs --- Mr. Shah actually gave TAX DOLLARS, DIRECTLY, to a firm in Sri Lanka who&#039;s PURPOSE is to OUTSOURCE AMERICAN &quot;I.T.&quot; JOBS!:

http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/integration/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=226500202

Rajiv Shah was appointed to his current position by President Barrack Hussein Obama. You endorsed Obama, in many Hindu and Asian-American newsletters, long before Obama had defeated Hillary Clinton, in the Democrat Primary. You even campaigned, personally, for President Obama, in Texas and other states, during the Primary and General elections.

Mr. Goyle, if you truly object to tax breaks given to domestic companies, for &quot;outsourcing jobs&#039; --- should you not be even more vocal, in your opposition, to American tax dollars being sent DIRECTLY to foreign countries, for the purpose of outsourcing jobs?

Then we come to the White and Case law firm. Mr. Brian Miller, at White and Case, is the former senior legal adviser for USAID:

http://www.whitecase.com/bmiller/

Of course, Monica K. Arora also works at the  White and Case law firm:

http://www.whitecase.com/marora/

Monica Arora&#039;s expertise is in the area of INTERNATIONAL investments, and in &quot;carried interest&quot;. &quot;Carried interest&quot; is a kind of tax shelter, which converts ordinary income into capital gains:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carried_interest

It certainly appears that Monica Arora is involved, directly, in raising money from wealthy Americans. She then uses that investment capital to fund FOREIGN industries. Monica Arora designs methods to convert the interest, or ordinary income, from these investments, into tax advantaged capital gains.

Of course, Monica K. Arora is married to Rajeev Goyle:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/style/weddings-celebrations-monica-arora-rajeev-goyle.html

I have presented several issues for you to deal with, of course. If I have made a mistake, in the identities or facts involved, please let me know. I will correct the record, as far as my statements are concerned, immediately, if you can prove that I am in error in any way.

Beyond the fact that Monica K. Arora appears to live in Maryland, and she appears to work in New York, for a Wall Street, hedge fund, law office, (which raises questions about YOUR actual residence) ---

I have honest, sincere questions about your hypocrisy, and your obvious conflicts of interest. What will you do  when the subject of taxation on international hedge fund investments comes up in Congress? (Should you win the election.)

Let us not forget that Democrat Congresswoman Maxine Waters is currently under investigation, by the House Ethics Committee, for seeking favors for a Bank, on behalf of her husband:

&quot;CNN) -- California Rep. Maxine Waters is pressing the House ethics panel to set her trial date before the midterm elections in November. ---The 10-term congresswoman is accused of violating House rules by seeking federal assistance for a bank with financial ties to her husband.&quot;

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/08/06/maxine.waters/index.html

There are several purposes, to this emailed letter.

First, I would like you to correct this letter, if any portion of it is not true. I want specific, line-by-line corrections, with facts and evidence to support your requested changes, to the honest effort that I have made in presenting the facts, as I see them.

Second, I would respectfully ask you to stop running your misleading advertising, concerning the &quot;outsourcing of jobs&quot; and &quot;tax breaks.&quot; 

Third, I would further request that you promise the voters, immediately, that you will not use any current or future elective office to directly assist your friends, or your wife, Monica Arora, in their international investment activities.

Fourth, I would ask that you publicly object to the deal just announced by Rajiv Shah, and the USAID, under the direction of the Obama Administration. That deal will outsource American jobs.

Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rajeev Goyle<br />
Democrat Candidate for Congress</p>
<p>Mr. Goyle;</p>
<p>I have serious questions about your rather hypocritical campaign advertising, most notably the commercial at this link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kv7oCrClE84" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kv7oCrClE84</a></p>
<p>How can you keep a straight face, when you attack the &#8220;outsourcing of American Jobs&#8221; and &#8220;tax breaks&#8221; for outsourcing jobs, when so many people, who are very close to you, make their living doing EXACTLY that?</p>
<p>Let us begin with Rajiv Shah, the director of USAID or the United States Agency for International Development. Mr. Shah did more than just give &#8220;tax breaks&#8221; for outsourcing jobs &#8212; Mr. Shah actually gave TAX DOLLARS, DIRECTLY, to a firm in Sri Lanka who&#8217;s PURPOSE is to OUTSOURCE AMERICAN &#8220;I.T.&#8221; JOBS!:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/integration/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=226500202" rel="nofollow">http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/integration/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=226500202</a></p>
<p>Rajiv Shah was appointed to his current position by President Barrack Hussein Obama. You endorsed Obama, in many Hindu and Asian-American newsletters, long before Obama had defeated Hillary Clinton, in the Democrat Primary. You even campaigned, personally, for President Obama, in Texas and other states, during the Primary and General elections.</p>
<p>Mr. Goyle, if you truly object to tax breaks given to domestic companies, for &#8220;outsourcing jobs&#8217; &#8212; should you not be even more vocal, in your opposition, to American tax dollars being sent DIRECTLY to foreign countries, for the purpose of outsourcing jobs?</p>
<p>Then we come to the White and Case law firm. Mr. Brian Miller, at White and Case, is the former senior legal adviser for USAID:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whitecase.com/bmiller/" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitecase.com/bmiller/</a></p>
<p>Of course, Monica K. Arora also works at the  White and Case law firm:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whitecase.com/marora/" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitecase.com/marora/</a></p>
<p>Monica Arora&#8217;s expertise is in the area of INTERNATIONAL investments, and in &#8220;carried interest&#8221;. &#8220;Carried interest&#8221; is a kind of tax shelter, which converts ordinary income into capital gains:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carried_interest" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carried_interest</a></p>
<p>It certainly appears that Monica Arora is involved, directly, in raising money from wealthy Americans. She then uses that investment capital to fund FOREIGN industries. Monica Arora designs methods to convert the interest, or ordinary income, from these investments, into tax advantaged capital gains.</p>
<p>Of course, Monica K. Arora is married to Rajeev Goyle:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/style/weddings-celebrations-monica-arora-rajeev-goyle.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/style/weddings-celebrations-monica-arora-rajeev-goyle.html</a></p>
<p>I have presented several issues for you to deal with, of course. If I have made a mistake, in the identities or facts involved, please let me know. I will correct the record, as far as my statements are concerned, immediately, if you can prove that I am in error in any way.</p>
<p>Beyond the fact that Monica K. Arora appears to live in Maryland, and she appears to work in New York, for a Wall Street, hedge fund, law office, (which raises questions about YOUR actual residence) &#8212;</p>
<p>I have honest, sincere questions about your hypocrisy, and your obvious conflicts of interest. What will you do  when the subject of taxation on international hedge fund investments comes up in Congress? (Should you win the election.)</p>
<p>Let us not forget that Democrat Congresswoman Maxine Waters is currently under investigation, by the House Ethics Committee, for seeking favors for a Bank, on behalf of her husband:</p>
<p>&#8220;CNN) &#8212; California Rep. Maxine Waters is pressing the House ethics panel to set her trial date before the midterm elections in November. &#8212;The 10-term congresswoman is accused of violating House rules by seeking federal assistance for a bank with financial ties to her husband.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/08/06/maxine.waters/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/08/06/maxine.waters/index.html</a></p>
<p>There are several purposes, to this emailed letter.</p>
<p>First, I would like you to correct this letter, if any portion of it is not true. I want specific, line-by-line corrections, with facts and evidence to support your requested changes, to the honest effort that I have made in presenting the facts, as I see them.</p>
<p>Second, I would respectfully ask you to stop running your misleading advertising, concerning the &#8220;outsourcing of jobs&#8221; and &#8220;tax breaks.&#8221; </p>
<p>Third, I would further request that you promise the voters, immediately, that you will not use any current or future elective office to directly assist your friends, or your wife, Monica Arora, in their international investment activities.</p>
<p>Fourth, I would ask that you publicly object to the deal just announced by Rajiv Shah, and the USAID, under the direction of the Obama Administration. That deal will outsource American jobs.</p>
<p>Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Renegade &#8220;KRA&#8221; ordered to &#8220;cease and desist&#8221; using RNC name, lead by self-admitted domestic violence offender by PRwichita</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/2341/comment-page-1#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>PRwichita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=2341#comment-601</guid>
		<description>I support Mike Pompeo.
I also support Todd Tiahrt.

Let me make a suggestion, as a person speaking ONLY for myself:

Let&#039;s not make the KRA name/ownership an issue, just now. It will only hurt us, now and in the General Election. 

I understand the conflict, and it makes me sad. 

Please, however, lets keep our eyes on the ball --- WINNING IN NOVEMBER WITH CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATES THAT WE NOMINATE, IN AUGUST!

I respect the decision of the OFFICIAL KRA to stay neutral in some Kansas races.

I also recall Right to Life of Kansas and Kansans For Life SPLIT --- it was bad for the movement, confusing to the membership, and handed victory after victory to George Tiller and the Left!

&quot;Discretion is the better half of valor&quot; --- KRA, you have EVERY right to assert your authority and your ownership. You have posted, on your web pages, a very strong case.

I would suggest that the people you have issues with are, by your own estimation, very small in number. They have neither the volunteers nor the resources to get their message out.

Stating, in press release after press release, and here on your Blog, that the official KRA is NEUTRAL in the Senate Race and that the official KRA has endorsed Pompeo, in the 4th District, is the best you can do, at this time, without harm to the Conservative cause.

Like it or not, the left will use the dirty laundry of any and all &quot;conservatives&quot; to hurt ALL conservatives. 

If I knew how to get the other &quot;organization&quot; involved, to see the light and back down, I would do whatever I could to help.

I am sorry, I don&#039;t know how to help.

Things like this are part of the reason I partially &quot;retired&quot; from politics, several years ago.

Again folks, a public fight with this other organization will only draw attention to splits in the movement, and will only help the Left.

I throw my support behind THIS group, where I am posting now, where this controversy is concerned.

Nearly everyone else will do the same, if you play this out with the class, dignity and grace that I know all of you have, inside you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I support Mike Pompeo.<br />
I also support Todd Tiahrt.</p>
<p>Let me make a suggestion, as a person speaking ONLY for myself:</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not make the KRA name/ownership an issue, just now. It will only hurt us, now and in the General Election. </p>
<p>I understand the conflict, and it makes me sad. </p>
<p>Please, however, lets keep our eyes on the ball &#8212; WINNING IN NOVEMBER WITH CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATES THAT WE NOMINATE, IN AUGUST!</p>
<p>I respect the decision of the OFFICIAL KRA to stay neutral in some Kansas races.</p>
<p>I also recall Right to Life of Kansas and Kansans For Life SPLIT &#8212; it was bad for the movement, confusing to the membership, and handed victory after victory to George Tiller and the Left!</p>
<p>&#8220;Discretion is the better half of valor&#8221; &#8212; KRA, you have EVERY right to assert your authority and your ownership. You have posted, on your web pages, a very strong case.</p>
<p>I would suggest that the people you have issues with are, by your own estimation, very small in number. They have neither the volunteers nor the resources to get their message out.</p>
<p>Stating, in press release after press release, and here on your Blog, that the official KRA is NEUTRAL in the Senate Race and that the official KRA has endorsed Pompeo, in the 4th District, is the best you can do, at this time, without harm to the Conservative cause.</p>
<p>Like it or not, the left will use the dirty laundry of any and all &#8220;conservatives&#8221; to hurt ALL conservatives. </p>
<p>If I knew how to get the other &#8220;organization&#8221; involved, to see the light and back down, I would do whatever I could to help.</p>
<p>I am sorry, I don&#8217;t know how to help.</p>
<p>Things like this are part of the reason I partially &#8220;retired&#8221; from politics, several years ago.</p>
<p>Again folks, a public fight with this other organization will only draw attention to splits in the movement, and will only help the Left.</p>
<p>I throw my support behind THIS group, where I am posting now, where this controversy is concerned.</p>
<p>Nearly everyone else will do the same, if you play this out with the class, dignity and grace that I know all of you have, inside you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raj Goyle a &#8220;NO&#8221; vote on the budget? by PRwichita</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/2272/comment-page-1#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>PRwichita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=2272#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Rajeev Goyle is a mouthpiece for George Soros.

Goyle&#039;s wife is a high-powered Wall Street Hedge Fund Attorney. The Goyle&#039;s are well known political insiders, in the Washington D.C. area.

Goyle worked for the ACLU, when the ACLU supported Fred Phelps on 1st Amendment grounds.

Then, Goyle carpet-bagged to Wichita and attacked Bonnie Huy, for &quot;not doing enough to stop Fred Phelps!&quot;

Goyle also attacked Huy on the immigration issue, which is absurd, because the ACLU and the Center for American Progress, which Goyle worked for, are BOTH open-borders/Amnesty supporting organizations.

Goyle will try to run as a conservative. 

Goyle is a complete fraud!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rajeev Goyle is a mouthpiece for George Soros.</p>
<p>Goyle&#8217;s wife is a high-powered Wall Street Hedge Fund Attorney. The Goyle&#8217;s are well known political insiders, in the Washington D.C. area.</p>
<p>Goyle worked for the ACLU, when the ACLU supported Fred Phelps on 1st Amendment grounds.</p>
<p>Then, Goyle carpet-bagged to Wichita and attacked Bonnie Huy, for &#8220;not doing enough to stop Fred Phelps!&#8221;</p>
<p>Goyle also attacked Huy on the immigration issue, which is absurd, because the ACLU and the Center for American Progress, which Goyle worked for, are BOTH open-borders/Amnesty supporting organizations.</p>
<p>Goyle will try to run as a conservative. </p>
<p>Goyle is a complete fraud!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TEA Party Video: Stay Strong by marlenan</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/1230/comment-page-1#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>marlenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=1230#comment-596</guid>
		<description>Why is it that there is no information on here about various Tea Party groups throughout Southwest Kansas? Are there no organizers in Southwest Kansas? Is there no movement in Southwest Kansas? Also why do I see a bias in this organization toward certain Candidates and not others? Is it really all about following the big war chests of the &quot;career politicians&quot;? I am wondering if my tea bag that I sent to Washington got soiled and muddied with so many biased bags that went also. Why is there not more uproar on the wasteful spending of our taxes on Illegal Aliens in this country?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that there is no information on here about various Tea Party groups throughout Southwest Kansas? Are there no organizers in Southwest Kansas? Is there no movement in Southwest Kansas? Also why do I see a bias in this organization toward certain Candidates and not others? Is it really all about following the big war chests of the &#8220;career politicians&#8221;? I am wondering if my tea bag that I sent to Washington got soiled and muddied with so many biased bags that went also. Why is there not more uproar on the wasteful spending of our taxes on Illegal Aliens in this country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New report on uninsured children confirms Healthwave enrollment failures by Me</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/1853/comment-page-1#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=1853#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Healthwave has failed my family so far. My children have been without insurance for about five months now because my husband lost his job. We previously made way too much too qualify but now that we do.....almost 4 months after applying we&#039;ve heard nothing. I think it&#039;s sad and almost pathetic that you have to be pregnant to be approved right away. WAY TO GO KANSAS- It&#039;s crossed my mind- the idea of having another child just so my children now can have healthcare.....THANKS ALSO TO THE USA- my husband and I would love to move to Denmark- they care for their people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Healthwave has failed my family so far. My children have been without insurance for about five months now because my husband lost his job. We previously made way too much too qualify but now that we do&#8230;..almost 4 months after applying we&#8217;ve heard nothing. I think it&#8217;s sad and almost pathetic that you have to be pregnant to be approved right away. WAY TO GO KANSAS- It&#8217;s crossed my mind- the idea of having another child just so my children now can have healthcare&#8230;..THANKS ALSO TO THE USA- my husband and I would love to move to Denmark- they care for their people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When you say you are a Republican candidate, shouldn&#8217;t it mean something specific? by Backroadsnews</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/1941/comment-page-1#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Backroadsnews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=1941#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I have no problem with a litmus test or whatever you want to call it. Being a Republican should stand for something.
I do wonder, though, why we have to continue to bring President Reagan into the discussion. I have no problem with him, but I was in grade school when he was president so I really don&#039;t have any connection to him. Nor do most younger voters.
I think we need to keep the focus on the principles, not on specific individuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no problem with a litmus test or whatever you want to call it. Being a Republican should stand for something.<br />
I do wonder, though, why we have to continue to bring President Reagan into the discussion. I have no problem with him, but I was in grade school when he was president so I really don&#8217;t have any connection to him. Nor do most younger voters.<br />
I think we need to keep the focus on the principles, not on specific individuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2010 KRA Gala Banquet tickets are now on sale! by Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/1952/comment-page-1#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=1952#comment-587</guid>
		<description>Well, I wish I was in Kansas for Kansas Days.  Unfortunately, I am stuck in Florida on vacation.  It is horrible down here.  It is hot and sunny.  This 70 degree weather makes me miss the depressing skies and snow of Kansas.

Well anyway, I got go.  Time to go the beach and gather seashells.

Later. 

tdus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I wish I was in Kansas for Kansas Days.  Unfortunately, I am stuck in Florida on vacation.  It is horrible down here.  It is hot and sunny.  This 70 degree weather makes me miss the depressing skies and snow of Kansas.</p>
<p>Well anyway, I got go.  Time to go the beach and gather seashells.</p>
<p>Later. </p>
<p>tdus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When you say you are a Republican candidate, shouldn&#8217;t it mean something specific? by Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/1941/comment-page-1#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=1941#comment-586</guid>
		<description>I also think Sam Brownback and his cronies need to be purged.  Brownback ruined our nation as a Senator.  Why would we want him to be a GOV? Look at how hard Ron Thornburgh worked to be our next GOV.  And then in pops Brownback and his cronies ruining our state party.  Get rid of Brownback.  


I don&#039;t trust him and look what he did to our nation?  What is he going to do?  Ruin Kansas now?  No thanks, Sam.  You have done enough damage.  Be honorable and just retire.  

tdus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think Sam Brownback and his cronies need to be purged.  Brownback ruined our nation as a Senator.  Why would we want him to be a GOV? Look at how hard Ron Thornburgh worked to be our next GOV.  And then in pops Brownback and his cronies ruining our state party.  Get rid of Brownback.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t trust him and look what he did to our nation?  What is he going to do?  Ruin Kansas now?  No thanks, Sam.  You have done enough damage.  Be honorable and just retire.  </p>
<p>tdus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When you say you are a Republican candidate, shouldn&#8217;t it mean something specific? by Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/1941/comment-page-1#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=1941#comment-585</guid>
		<description>Further, we need to get rid of Steve Cloud.  He is supporting both dems and republicans.  Why?  Ask him.  

He won&#039;t tell me.  But we know, don&#039;t we Steve?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further, we need to get rid of Steve Cloud.  He is supporting both dems and republicans.  Why?  Ask him.  </p>
<p>He won&#8217;t tell me.  But we know, don&#8217;t we Steve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When you say you are a Republican candidate, shouldn&#8217;t it mean something specific? by Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/1941/comment-page-1#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=1941#comment-584</guid>
		<description>Postscript.  And don&#039;t even get me started on how horrible Larry Gates is.  He, Sebelius and Moore collectively ruined the Kansas Democatic Socialist Party for decades.  The Dem Socialists failed to plan for a new generation of leaders.  Hence, due to that failure and lack of leadership, I joined the Kansas GOP.

The Kansas GOP is light years ahead of the Kansas Dem Socialists. And will remain that way for an indefinite future.  Blame Larry Gates.  I do.

tdus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Postscript.  And don&#8217;t even get me started on how horrible Larry Gates is.  He, Sebelius and Moore collectively ruined the Kansas Democatic Socialist Party for decades.  The Dem Socialists failed to plan for a new generation of leaders.  Hence, due to that failure and lack of leadership, I joined the Kansas GOP.</p>
<p>The Kansas GOP is light years ahead of the Kansas Dem Socialists. And will remain that way for an indefinite future.  Blame Larry Gates.  I do.</p>
<p>tdus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When you say you are a Republican candidate, shouldn&#8217;t it mean something specific? by Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/1941/comment-page-1#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=1941#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Well, considering the fact that I am one of the party leaders, no one asked me about this.  Why not?  

Regardless, I am a party leader reshaping the GOP so at least federally, we are going to sweep all federal elections.  And at the state and local level, we are going to do well also.  Everyone is tired of fiscal irresponibility.  And it time to hold those whom almost caused our country to collaspe to the biggest depression since the Great Depression, there is the imminent need for a &quot;new generation of leaders&quot;.  As stated by Moore.  Finally, he said something I agree with.  Further, isn&#039;t Nick Jordan the same generation as Moore.  We need to get rid of him also.  

Election a new generation of leaders in 2010.  Try Scherer.  He is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, considering the fact that I am one of the party leaders, no one asked me about this.  Why not?  </p>
<p>Regardless, I am a party leader reshaping the GOP so at least federally, we are going to sweep all federal elections.  And at the state and local level, we are going to do well also.  Everyone is tired of fiscal irresponibility.  And it time to hold those whom almost caused our country to collaspe to the biggest depression since the Great Depression, there is the imminent need for a &#8220;new generation of leaders&#8221;.  As stated by Moore.  Finally, he said something I agree with.  Further, isn&#8217;t Nick Jordan the same generation as Moore.  We need to get rid of him also.  </p>
<p>Election a new generation of leaders in 2010.  Try Scherer.  He is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KS-03 poll winner by Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/1923/comment-page-1#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=1923#comment-582</guid>
		<description>I never stated I voted for myself seven times.  I merely stated I could have.  I have a lot of integrity.  My commewnts merely reflected how some polls (like the Olathe Republican poll) are not valid.  I clearly explained how this was rigged for whatever outcome the Olathe GOP party favored.  It was entirely bogus,  Just like this poll.

I am doing real stuff to earn votes.  What are these other congressional candidates doing today, right now to earn your vote?  Me, I continue to challenge the new Court of Tax Appeals including the method of assessing real estate taxes using the comparables nonsense scheme employed in all 105 counties in Kansas.  Scheduled for a four hour jury trial on April 30, 2010.  That is just one of the things I am doing.  I assure you there are many things I am doing concurrently to earn your vote.  

How about these other yahoos?  If they are still supporting the Fair Tax, don&#039;t vote for them.  For clearly, they have not read it, or fail to understand what this will do to every Kansan that has children or students from k-12 and at state colleges here in Kansas.  The Fair Tax is not a fair tax.

tdus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never stated I voted for myself seven times.  I merely stated I could have.  I have a lot of integrity.  My commewnts merely reflected how some polls (like the Olathe Republican poll) are not valid.  I clearly explained how this was rigged for whatever outcome the Olathe GOP party favored.  It was entirely bogus,  Just like this poll.</p>
<p>I am doing real stuff to earn votes.  What are these other congressional candidates doing today, right now to earn your vote?  Me, I continue to challenge the new Court of Tax Appeals including the method of assessing real estate taxes using the comparables nonsense scheme employed in all 105 counties in Kansas.  Scheduled for a four hour jury trial on April 30, 2010.  That is just one of the things I am doing.  I assure you there are many things I am doing concurrently to earn your vote.  </p>
<p>How about these other yahoos?  If they are still supporting the Fair Tax, don&#8217;t vote for them.  For clearly, they have not read it, or fail to understand what this will do to every Kansan that has children or students from k-12 and at state colleges here in Kansas.  The Fair Tax is not a fair tax.</p>
<p>tdus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When you say you are a Republican candidate, shouldn&#8217;t it mean something specific? by whereistheoutrage</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/1941/comment-page-1#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>whereistheoutrage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=1941#comment-579</guid>
		<description>This is such a no-brainer.  It needs done PERIOD.  This is so common sense it is stupid.  The dems do this kind of thing all day long and then whine all day long about how non-inclusive it is if we enough think about it.  Their pro-abort and pro-GIVEEVERYDIMEINTHEWORLDTOEDUCATION litmus tests are just a starting point.  It isn&#039;t even about &quot;conservative&quot; principles.  Let&#039;s get real for a minute.  Not everyone in the GOP is a conservative and not every conservative is of that bent for the same reason.  We have a big house.  It just doesn&#039;t need to include RINO&#039;s.  So, instead of camping out on requiring conservative principles, we should simply rate votes and require anyone running under our banner to meet the same test that legislation does -- 3/4.  If during the last legislative session, you did not vote 75% in line with GOP principles, you should not be able to register in the next election as a GOP candidate.  It doesn&#039;t get any more straightforward than that.  We have a minimum threshold we much maintain.  Since we are a party of principles and integrity, why let there be so much wiggle room?  You have to be 18 to vote.  So, if you are a really good person and you just saved someone&#039;s life and you say you are very careful and pay a lot of attention to the issues should we let you vote at 17.5?  Probably, but we can&#039;t bend the rules for you.  Neither should we bend our principles to include people without any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such a no-brainer.  It needs done PERIOD.  This is so common sense it is stupid.  The dems do this kind of thing all day long and then whine all day long about how non-inclusive it is if we enough think about it.  Their pro-abort and pro-GIVEEVERYDIMEINTHEWORLDTOEDUCATION litmus tests are just a starting point.  It isn&#8217;t even about &#8220;conservative&#8221; principles.  Let&#8217;s get real for a minute.  Not everyone in the GOP is a conservative and not every conservative is of that bent for the same reason.  We have a big house.  It just doesn&#8217;t need to include RINO&#8217;s.  So, instead of camping out on requiring conservative principles, we should simply rate votes and require anyone running under our banner to meet the same test that legislation does &#8212; 3/4.  If during the last legislative session, you did not vote 75% in line with GOP principles, you should not be able to register in the next election as a GOP candidate.  It doesn&#8217;t get any more straightforward than that.  We have a minimum threshold we much maintain.  Since we are a party of principles and integrity, why let there be so much wiggle room?  You have to be 18 to vote.  So, if you are a really good person and you just saved someone&#8217;s life and you say you are very careful and pay a lot of attention to the issues should we let you vote at 17.5?  Probably, but we can&#8217;t bend the rules for you.  Neither should we bend our principles to include people without any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KS-03 poll winner by dmiller</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/1923/comment-page-1#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>dmiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=1923#comment-577</guid>
		<description>I hope we can agree that an uncontrolled Internet poll is a weak means of guessing any real sentiment from the KS-03 district.  The fact that Scherer got even seven votes, means you know that he voted for himself seven times (also, KRA, please spell the candidates names correctly, it&#039;s &quot;Scherer&quot;).

I do like the Lightner has some &quot;real world&quot; experience in her: family, job outside of politics, etc... but she doesn&#039;t have the political savvy or broad reach/vision to go very far.  John Rysavy is a semi-unknown candidate that has some real potential.  Good public speaker, good practical experience, and the people that know him have a lot of good things to say about him.  Kevin Yoder?  Great politician.  Maybe the most electable candidate there, and certainly has some money and support behind him.  A bit young, but, there have certainly been younger candidates before him that have done quite well.  (&quot;Well&quot; being in political terms.)  Lyndon Johnson was 28 in his first term as a Congressman, and we&#039;ve seen that sometimes is the drive and ambition that counts.

Now, lets see how quickly they beat each other up and spend all their money in the primaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope we can agree that an uncontrolled Internet poll is a weak means of guessing any real sentiment from the KS-03 district.  The fact that Scherer got even seven votes, means you know that he voted for himself seven times (also, KRA, please spell the candidates names correctly, it&#8217;s &#8220;Scherer&#8221;).</p>
<p>I do like the Lightner has some &#8220;real world&#8221; experience in her: family, job outside of politics, etc&#8230; but she doesn&#8217;t have the political savvy or broad reach/vision to go very far.  John Rysavy is a semi-unknown candidate that has some real potential.  Good public speaker, good practical experience, and the people that know him have a lot of good things to say about him.  Kevin Yoder?  Great politician.  Maybe the most electable candidate there, and certainly has some money and support behind him.  A bit young, but, there have certainly been younger candidates before him that have done quite well.  (&#8220;Well&#8221; being in political terms.)  Lyndon Johnson was 28 in his first term as a Congressman, and we&#8217;ve seen that sometimes is the drive and ambition that counts.</p>
<p>Now, lets see how quickly they beat each other up and spend all their money in the primaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poll: KS-03 Republican primary by Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasra.org/blog/archives/1876/comment-page-1#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Scherer Congressional Candidate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasra.org/blog/?p=1876#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Can I send the KRA 40 bucks so I get more votes in this poll?  Let me know before the poll closes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I send the KRA 40 bucks so I get more votes in this poll?  Let me know before the poll closes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
